Monday, November 27, 2006

High Court To Weigh
Climate Change Case

by H. Josef Hebert - November 26th, 2006 -

The Supreme Court hears arguments this week in a case that could determine whether the Bush administration must change course in how it deals with the threat of global warming.

A dozen states as well as environmental groups and large cities are trying to convince the court that the Environmental Protection Agency must regulate, as a matter of public health, the amount of carbon dioxide that comes from vehicles.

Now that all cases of abortion and homsexuality are governed by the Supreme Court due to their finding "rights" written in the Constitution in really really small print that only the Justices of the Supreme Court have ever been able to see, they now seem prepared to find that global warming was predicted in the Constitution and there is a really really small print "right" to spend tax payer money regulating anyone who is producing anything that lawyers think contribute to global warming.

The court does not seem to think that anyone would consider them buffoons for finding the right to sodomy in the Constitution's fine print. Finding a "right" to kill an unborn child was certainly not a major contributor to contempt for these nine clowns. So why would a "finding" that clear specific "rights" about global warming was in the Constitution's fine print surprise anyone?

The "rule of law" has ceased to exist in America. Today the only thing we have is the "rule of judges" and they have nothing but contempt for anyone who did not attend law school.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home