Who says they’re your kids?

Not in Montana

by Frank Miele - October 11th, 2009 - Daily Inter Lake

The one bright spot in the ruling came not from the benighted majority, but from the lone dissenter, Justice Jim Rice, who spoke eloquently for parents and for sanity.

"The Court's decision," Rice noted, "will open a Pandora's Box of potential attacks upon the right of fit and capable parents to raise their own children."

After establishing that the Montana Supreme Court has previously held fast to the rule that "a finding of abuse, neglect or dependency is the jurisdictional prerequisite for any court-ordered transfer of custody from a natural parent to a third party," Rice demonstrates conclusively that his fellow justices in this ruling have ruled in favor of Kulstad "for the apparent purpose of diminishing the reach of the constitutional rights previously declared for parents."

Once again the activist judges in our corrupt court system have ignored all law and precedent and ruled the way they want.. just because they can. Anyone who continues to consider our courts and our judges to be worthy of respect is just as corrupt as the rulings they pull out of their bodily orifices.

This is the epitome of the rule of judges destroying the rule of law.