Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Obama Picks Sotomayor For High Court

by Ben Feller - May 26th, 2009 - Breitbart.com

President Barack Obama tapped federal appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court on Tuesday, officials said, making her the first Hispanic [or should that be Latina - see update at bottom] in history picked to wear the robes of a justice.


Obama had said publicly he wanted a justice who combined intellect and empathy—the ability to understand the troubles of everyday Americans.

Considering that Sotomayor is like many Hispanics and most blacks, a vitriolic hater of America (to such an extent that she rejects the term American and calls herself a Newyorican) it is unlikely that respect for "the rule of law" will be high on her agenda. But she does have an agenda. Sotomayor: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male..." How can anyone talk about themselves in the third person and not be ridiculed, especially when spewing racist gibberish like this statement.

The very fact that she and Obama claim she is the first Hispanic Judge, despite the highly admired Justice Benjamin Cardozo, indicates just how narrow their view of Hispanic is. To them Hispanic really means America hating new world descended immigrant. Coming from a European country like Portugal simply does not count. With this bias dripping from their claim, who expects Sotamayor to be anything but a racist anti-white, redistribution of wealth socialist, who subverts the Constitution at will.

This is consistent with Obama's consistent opposition to our Bill of Rights. I am flabbergasted at how few people know that while Obama was an Illinois State Senator he complained in a radio interview about the 'negative liberties' in the Constitution that prohibit our federal and state governments from doing things to make people live as they 'should'. Sotomayor is right out of that same mold, holding our Constitution in contempt.

That may explain why she has been reversed 60% of the time and is about to be reversed again on her imposition of a racist solution in a case about reverse discrimination.

As Jeffrey Rosen noted in his article here, even many of her friends in the Democrat Party are said to feel she is, "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench," as one former Second Circuit clerk put it. "She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue." (During one argument, an elderly judicial colleague is said to have leaned over and said, "Will you please stop talking and let them talk?")

A talker who thinks highly of herself. Now why would anybody be surprised that this would impress the narcissistic reader of teleprompters. The question her supporters should have to answer is simple, "Given her repeated public contempt for whites and males, how can she be expected to to rule impartially for ALL Americans?"

UPDATE: In response to a vitriolic and profanity laced email about this posting, I have learned at least one thing. Sotomayor is conceded to not be the first Hispanic Justice, but is the first Latina Justice! This is based on the rationale that Hispanic is no longer an appropriate name for people of the new world. I am informed the Spanish and Portuguese "imperialists from Europe" should not be allowed to give their name to the Latinas and Latinos that they oppressed. Therefore Cardoza can retain the claim to be the first Hispanic Justice but Sotomayo is the first Latina Justice. ROTFL. Do these liberals never tire of changing definitions to make sure they can denigrate anyone white or American?

UPDATE 2: Bloggers are saying that John McCain has congratulated Obama on a "great pick". Now I know she is not qualified.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home