Impeaching Justice Roberts?
by Jason Mattera - October 26th, 2010 - Human Events
It’s come to this: Democrats are so desperate at trying to mobilize the left wing of their base to prevent an electoral bloodbath next week that one congressman is actually promising to impeach Justice John Roberts from the Supreme Court. Why? Because Roberts allegedly “perjured” himself in the Citizens United case when he, along with four of his colleagues, struck down portions of campaign finance law as unconstitutional. You see, Roberts wasn’t acting as an objective “umpire,” but as an activist, flippantly overturning precedent to quench his conservative worldview.Why are conservatives so outraged that anyone would think of impeaching a Supreme Court justice to assure victory in the ongoing political war for our nation's future? The courts have been corrupt for generations and have sabotaged respect for Constitutional Law and Individual Freedom on many occasions. Why then are conservatives shocked at the idea of judges being impeached?
I love the idea. I personally think that the greatest way to get our country back is to end the insanity of a single judge having the power to issue an injunction against the will of the people as expressed in the laws our legislature has passed. I want those people impeached.
I want mass impeachment the next time the Supreme Court destroys our Constitution by ruling based on international law. Get rid of everyone who supported the ruling in one big event. I want conservatives and libertarians to wake up to the reality that our courts have no respect for 'the rule of law'. Today we have 'the rule of judges'. I may disagree with which judges to impeach but I absolutely embrace the idea that it is time to start impeaching judges. I want to impeach all that think their rulings are the last word and that the Constitution is a 'living document' they can subvert.
Stop being outraged at the idea itself. Respond instead with a gleeful, "Yes lets impeach some judges. I have a long list!"
Washington Post Blockbuster
Confirms Worst Fears About
Holder Justice Deptartment
by Andrew Breitbart - October 22nd, 2010 - Big Government
Congratulations to the editors at the Washington Post. Seventeen months after the Eric Holder Justice Department dismissed a slam-dunk case against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation, the Post gets around to printing a thorough vetting of the dismissal. The story is slated for Saturday’s print edition. While other media like Breitbart/The Bigs, Fox News, the Washington Times, the Weekly Standard, Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Investors Business Daily, Pajamas Media, and Drudge have had dozens of stories on the corrupt New Black Panther dismissal, the Washington Post at last is in the game.The only question is whether this will matter in the election or not. It should. That Obama is using the Justice Department to get even with 'Whitey' is a major story. All that remains is to see if it matters to any of Obama's supporters who claim to care about equal treatment under the law. I do not have the confidence that Breitbart has that this will matter to most of them. I think they are just as corrupt as Holder and Obama.
Free Speech Cases At Top
Of Supreme Court's Agenda
by Mark Sherman - October 2nd, 2010 - My Way News (Associated Press)
First Amendment cases top the Supreme Court's docket as it begins a new term with a new justice and three women on the bench for the first time.That is worrisome. That these power hungry totalitarian oligarchs are so focused on deciding when someone can speak in our society is not encouraging. Their deciding who a complainant can make the targets of their rage, even when the target is not involved in abusing the people who are unhappy, is even more frightening.
The court will look at provocative anti-gay protests at military funerals and a California law banning the sale of violent video games to children. These cases worry free speech advocates, who fear the court could limit First Amendment freedoms.
The funeral protest lawsuit, over signs praising American war deaths, "is one of those cases that tests our commitment to the First Amendment," said Steven Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union.
It is clear if the suit against the church who expresses displeasure with ALL of our troops, mocking them at their funerals, stands up as just proper free speech, it will be important to do the same to all liberals in response. Signs at the funeral of every registered Democrat should be displayed calling them "communist scum" and mocking their attempts to destroy American freedom.
Even worse though is the refusal by the courts to address the serious issues that are destroying justice under the Obama administration. How can these judicial oligarchs ignore the abuse of Obama taking the "secured" rights of GM and Chrysler bond holders and simply stealing their property. They gave this wealth to the unions who bribed the progressive movement officials with their illegal campaign contributions. There is no more blatant quid pro quo example of criminal conduct in the history of our nation.
Our Supreme Court tyrants could care less.
There is no justice in America. Our courts are corrupt.